Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 79
Filtrar
1.
Rev. esp. quimioter ; 36(2): 114-124, abr. 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-217393

RESUMEN

Predictions for a near end of the pandemic by the World Health Organization should be interpreted with caution. Current evidence indicates that the efficacy of a fourth dose of classical mRNA vaccines (BT162b2 or mRNA-1273) is low and short-lived in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in its predominant variant (Omicron). However, its efficacy is high against severe symptomatic infection, hospitalization and death. The new vaccines being introduced are bivalent and active against the Omicron variants. Potential new vaccines to be introduced in the coming year include a vaccine based on a recombinant protein that emulates the receptor binding domain of the Spike protein under development by the Spanish company Hipra, as well as vaccines for nasal or oral administration. Available information suggests that vaccines against COVID-19 can be administered in association with influenza vaccination without particular complications. New drugs against COVID-19, both antiviral and anti-inflammatory, are under investigation, but this does not seem to be the case with monoclonal antibodies. The indication to use masks in some circumstances will be maintained next year in view of the accumulation of scientific data on their efficacy. Finally, the long COVID or Post-COVID syndrome may continue to affect a very high proportion of patients who have had the disease, requiring combined diagnostic and therapeutic resources. (AU)


Las predicciones para un próximo fin de la pandemia de la Organización Mundial de la Salud deben interpretarse con precaución. La evidencia actual indica que la eficacia de una cuarta dosis de las vacunas clásicas ARNm (BNT162b2 o mRNA-1273) es baja y de corta duración para prevenir la infección de SARS-CoV-2 en su variante predominante (Omicron). No obstante, su eficacia es alta frente a la infección sintomática grave, hospitalización y muerte. Las nuevas vacunas que están siendo introducidas son bivalentes y activas frente a las variantes Omicron. Entre las potenciales nuevas vacunas que se introducirán en el próximo año, se encuentra una vacuna basada en una proteína recombinante que emula el dominio de unión al receptor de la proteína Spike en desarrollo por la compañía española Hipra, así como vacunas de administración nasal u oral. La información disponible apunta a que las vacunas frente al COVID-19 podrán administrarse asociadas a la vacunación antigripal sin particulares complicaciones. Se encuentran en investigación nuevos fármacos frente a COVID-19 tanto antivirales como anti-inflamatorios pero no parece ocurrir lo mismo con los anticuerpos monoclonales. La indicación de utilizar mascarillas en algunas circunstancias se mantendrá el próximo año en vista a la acumulación de datos científicos sobre su eficacia. Finalmente, el síndrome del COVID largo o Post-COVID puede que siga afectando a una proporción muy elevada de los pacientes que sufrieron la enfermedad, requiriendo recursos diagnósticos y terapéuticos combinados. (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Pandemias , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Coronavirus Relacionado al Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Severo , Vacunación Masiva , Máscaras/tendencias
3.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 13149, 2022 07 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35909195

RESUMEN

Covering the face with masks in public settings has been recommended since the start of the pandemic. Because faces provide information about identity, and that face masks hide a portion of the face, it is plausible to expect individuals who wear a mask to consider themselves less identifiable. Prior research suggests that perceived identifiability is positively related to prosocial behavior, and with two pre-registered field studies (total N = 5706) we provide a currently relevant and practical test of this relation. Our findings indicate that mask wearers and non-wearers display equivalent levels of helping behavior (Studies 1 and 2), although mask wearers have a lower level of perceived identifiability than those without a mask (Study 2). Overall, our findings suggest that claims that face masks are related to selfish behavior are not warranted, and that there is no practical link between perceived identifiability and prosocial behavior.


Asunto(s)
Altruismo , COVID-19/prevención & control , Máscaras , Pandemias/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Máscaras/efectos adversos , Máscaras/tendencias
4.
PLoS One ; 17(3): e0265328, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35271654

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the era of COVID-19 where there is emphasis on the importance of wearing a mask, wearing it rightly is equally important. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice of wearing a mask in the general population of a developing country at three major tertiary care hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants of this cross-sectional study were patients and attendants at three major tertiary care hospital of Karachi Pakistan. Selected participants, through non-probability convenient sampling technique, were interviewed regarding knowledge, attitude, and practice of wearing mask using an Urdu translated version of a questionnaire used in an earlier study. Three summary scores (0 to 100) were computed to indicate participants' mask wearing practice, technique of putting it on, and technique of taking if off. Collected data were analyzed with the help of IBM SPSS version 19. RESULTS: A total of 370 selected individuals were interviewed, out of which 51.9% were male and mean age was 37.65±11.94 years. For more than 90% of the participants, wearing a face mask was a routine practicing during the pandemic. The mean practice score was 65.69±25.51, score for technique of putting on a face mask was 67.77±23.03, and score of technique of taking off a face mask was 51.01±29.23. Education level of participant tends to have positive relationship with all three scores, while presence of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as co-morbid had negative impact on mask wearing practice. CONCLUSION: We have observed suboptimal knowledge, attitude and practice of wearing mask among the selected individuals. There is a continued need to spread awareness and educate general population about the importance of using a face mask, as well as the proper technique of wearing and taking off a face mask.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Máscaras/tendencias , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Países en Desarrollo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Conocimiento , Masculino , Máscaras/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pakistán/epidemiología , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Centros de Atención Terciaria
5.
Anesth Analg ; 134(3): 524-531, 2022 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35180169

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases continue to surge in the United States with the emergence of new variants. Statewide variability and inconsistency in implementing risk mitigation strategies are widespread, particularly in regards to enforcing mask mandates and encouraging the public to become fully vaccinated. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study conducted on July 31, 2021, utilizing publicly available data from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services. The authors abstracted data on total COVID-19-related cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in the state of Wisconsin. The primary objective was comparison of total COVID-19-related cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in vaccinated versus unvaccinated people in the state of Wisconsin over a 31-day period (July 2021). Furthermore, we also performed a narrative review of the literature on COVID-19-related outcomes based on mask use and vaccination status. RESULTS: In the state of Wisconsin during July 2021, total COVID-19 cases was 125.4 per 100,000 fully vaccinated people versus 369.2 per 100,000 not fully vaccinated people (odds ratio [OR] = 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.35; P < .001). Total COVID-19 hospitalizations was 4.9 per 100,000 fully vaccinated people versus 18.2 per 100,000 not fully vaccinated people (OR = 0.27, 98% CI, 0.22-0.32; P < .001). Total COVID-19 deaths was 0.1 per 100,000 fully vaccinated people versus 1.1 per 100,000 not fully vaccinated people (OR = 0.09, 95% CI, 0.03-0.29; P < .001). Narrative review of the literature demonstrated high vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 infection prevention (79%-100% among fully vaccinated people), COVID-19-related hospitalization (87%-98% among fully vaccinated people), and COVID-19-related death (96.7%-98% among fully vaccinated people). Studies have also generally reported that mask use was associated with increased effectiveness in preventing COVID-19 infection ≤70%. CONCLUSIONS: Strict adherence to public mask use and fully vaccinated status are associated with improved COVID-19-related outcomes and can mitigate the spread, morbidity, and mortality of COVID-19. Anesthesiologists and intensivists should adhere to evidence-based guidelines in their approach and management of patients to help mitigate spread.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/mortalidad , Costo de Enfermedad , Hospitalización/tendencias , Programas Obligatorios/tendencias , Máscaras/tendencias , Vacunación/tendencias , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Programas Obligatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Máscaras/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad/tendencias , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Wisconsin/epidemiología
6.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0262830, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35108287

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: During the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been suggestions that various techniques could be employed to improve the fit and, therefore, the effectiveness of face masks. It is well recognized that improving fit tends to improve mask effectiveness, but whether these fit modifiers are reliable remains unexplored. In this study, we assess a range of common "fit hacks" to determine their ability to improve mask performance. METHODS: Between July and September 2020, qualitative fit testing was performed in an indoor living space. We used quantitative fit testing to assess the fit of both surgical masks and KN95 masks, with and without 'fit hacks', on four participants. Seven fit hacks were evaluated to assess impact on fit. Additionally, one participant applied each fit hack multiple times to assess how reliable hacks were when reapplied. A convenience of four participants took part in the study, three females and one male with a head circumference range of 54 to 60 centimetres. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The use of pantyhose, tape, and rubber bands were effective for most participants. A pantyhose overlayer was observed to be the most effective hack. High degrees of variation were noted between participants. However, little variation was noted within participants, with hacks generally showing similar benefit each time they were applied on a single participant. An inspection of the fit hacks once applied showed that individual facial features may have a significant impact on fit, especially the nose bridge. CONCLUSIONS: Fit hacks can be used to effectively improve the fit of surgical and KN95 masks, enhancing the protection provided to the wearer. However, many of the most effective hacks are very uncomfortable and unlikely to be tolerated for extended periods of time. The development of effective fit-improvement solutions remains a critical issue in need of further development.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Respiradores N95/tendencias , COVID-19/transmisión , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Máscaras/tendencias , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Equipo de Protección Personal/tendencias , Rendimiento Físico Funcional , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad
7.
PLoS One ; 17(1): e0261398, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35020749

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To quantify changes in adherence to mask and distancing guidelines in outdoor settings in Philadelphia, PA before and after President Trump announced he was infected with COVID-19. METHODS: We used Systematic Observation of Masking Adherence and Distancing (SOMAD) to assess mask adherence in parks, playgrounds, and commercial streets in the 10 City Council districts in Philadelphia PA. We compared adherence rates between August and September 2020 and after October 2, 2020. RESULTS: Disparities in mask adherence existed by age group, gender, and race/ethnicity, with females wearing masks correctly more often than males, seniors having higher mask use than other age groups, and Asians having higher adherence than other race/ethnicities. Correct mask use did not increase after the City released additional mask guidance in September but did after Oct 2. Incorrect mask use also decreased, but the percentage not having masks at all was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Vulnerability of leadership appears to influence population behavior. Public health departments likely need more resources to effectively and persuasively communicate critical safety messages related to COVID-19 transmission.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Máscaras/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/virología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Máscaras/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Philadelphia , Distanciamiento Físico , Salud Pública , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto Joven
8.
Respir Res ; 23(1): 18, 2022 Jan 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35093079

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has caused a global COVID-19 pandemic, leading to worldwide changes in public health measures. In addition to changes in the public sector (lockdowns, contact restrictions), hospitals modified care to minimize risk of infection and to mobilize resources for COVID-19 patients. Our study aimed to assess the impact of these measures on access to care and behaviour of patients with thoracic malignancies. METHODS: Thoracic oncology patients were surveyed in October 2020 using paper-based questionnaires to assess access to ambulatory care services and tumor-directed therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, behaviour regarding social distancing and wearing of face masks were assessed, as well as COVID-19 exposure, testing and vaccination. Results are presented as absolute and relative frequencies for categorical variables and means with standard deviation for numerical variables. We used t-test, and ANOVA to compare differences in metric variables and Chi2-test to compare proportions between groups. RESULTS: 93 of 245 (38%) patients surveyed completed the questionnaire. Respiration therapy and physical therapy were unavailable for 57% to 70% of patients during March/April. Appointments for tumor-directed therapy, tumor imaging, and follow-up care were postponed or cancelled for 18.9%, 13.6%, and 14.8% of patients, respectively. Patients reported their general health as mostly unaffected. The majority of patients surveyed did not report reducing their contacts with family. The majority reduced contact with friends. Most patients wore community masks, although a significant proportion reported respiratory difficulties during prolonged mask-wearing. 74 patients (80%) reported willingness to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSIONS: This survey provides insights into the patient experience during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Munich, Germany. Most patients reported no negative changes to cancer treatments or general health; however, allied health services were greatly impacted. Patients reported gaps in social distancing, but were prepared to wear community masks. The willingness to get vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 was high. This information is not only of high relevance to policy makers, but also to health care providers.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/tendencias , COVID-19/terapia , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/tendencias , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Oncología Médica/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Anciano , Citas y Horarios , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/transmisión , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Alemania , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Masculino , Máscaras/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/tendencias , Terapia Respiratoria/tendencias , Conducta Social , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento/tendencias
9.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 24490, 2021 12 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34966168

RESUMEN

During the first wave of Covid-19 infections in Germany in April 2020, clinics reported a shortage of filtering face masks with aerosol retention> 94% (FFP2 & 3, KN95, N95). Companies all over the world increased their production capacities, but quality control of once-certified materials and masks came up short. To help identify falsely labeled masks and ensure safe protection equipment, we tested 101 different batches of masks in 993 measurements with a self-made setup based on DIN standards. An aerosol generator provided a NaCl test aerosol which was applied to the mask. A laser aerosol spectrometer measured the aerosol concentration in a range from 90 to 500 nm to quantify the masks' retention. Of 101 tested mask batches, only 31 batches kept what their label promised. Especially in the initial phase of the pandemic in Germany, we observed fluctuating mask qualities. Many batches show very high variability in aerosol retention. In addition, by measuring with a laser aerosol spectrometer, we were able to show that not all masks filter small and large particles equally well. In this study we demonstrate how important internal and independent quality controls are, especially in times of need and shortage of personal protection equipment.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/transmisión , Máscaras/estadística & datos numéricos , Aerosoles , Filtración/instrumentación , Alemania , Humanos , Máscaras/normas , Máscaras/tendencias , Respiradores N95/normas , Respiradores N95/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Equipo de Protección Personal/normas , Control de Calidad , Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria/normas , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad
10.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 25(1 Suppl): 74-80, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34890037

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Face masks help contain the aerosol-mediated transmission of infectious viral particles released from individuals via cough and sneezes. However, the prolonged use of face masks has raised concerns regarding oral hygiene. Here, we present a mouthwash formulation based on α-cyclodextrin and hydroxytyrosol that can maintain healthy oral microbiota. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We isolated and cultured Candida albicans, Staphylococcus aureus, and a mix of Streptococcus sp., Staphylococcus sp. and Neisseria sp. from oral and throat swabs. The microorganisms were cultured in a standard medium with or without the mouthwash. To evaluate the effect of the mouthwash on the oral microbiota, the DNA from the saliva of 3 volunteers that used the mouthwash was extracted. Then, the DNA was amplified using primer pairs specific for bacterial and fungal DNA. Twelve further volunteers were offered to use the mouthwash and a questionnaire was submitted to them to assess the possible beneficial effects of mouthwash on halitosis and other oral disturbances. RESULTS: The bacteria and fungi cultured in media containing the mouthwash showed a growth reduction ranging from 20 to 80%. The PCR amplification of fungal and bacterial DNA extracted from volunteers that used the mouthwash showed a reduction of both bacteria and fungi. Volunteers that used the mouthwash reported a tendency towards a reduction of halitosis, gingival and mouth inflammation, and dry mouth. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a mouthwash containing α-cyclodextrin and hydroxytyrosol is not aggressive against oral mucosa; it is safe and effective to reduce the bacterial and fungal load due to the continuous use of face masks.


Asunto(s)
Máscaras/efectos adversos , Mucosa Bucal/efectos de los fármacos , Mucosa Bucal/microbiología , Antisépticos Bucales/administración & dosificación , Alcohol Feniletílico/análogos & derivados , alfa-Ciclodextrinas/administración & dosificación , Candida albicans/efectos de los fármacos , Candida albicans/crecimiento & desarrollo , Halitosis/etiología , Halitosis/microbiología , Halitosis/prevención & control , Humanos , Máscaras/tendencias , Neisseria/efectos de los fármacos , Neisseria/crecimiento & desarrollo , Alcohol Feniletílico/administración & dosificación , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/crecimiento & desarrollo , Factores de Tiempo
11.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 21675, 2021 11 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34737389

RESUMEN

The recent outbreak of the COVID-19 led to death of millions of people worldwide. To stave off the spread of the virus, the authorities in the US employed different strategies, including the mask mandate order issued by the states' governors. In the current work, we defined a parameter called average death ratio as the monthly average of the number of daily deaths to the monthly average number of daily cases. We utilized survey data to quantify people's abidance by the mask mandate order. Additionally, we implicitly addressed the extent to which people abide by the mask mandate order, which may depend on some parameters such as population, income, and education level. Using different machine learning classification algorithms, we investigated how the decrease or increase in death ratio for the counties in the US West Coast correlates with the input parameters. The results showed that for the majority of counties, the mask mandate order decreased the death ratio, reflecting the effectiveness of such a preventive measure on the West Coast. Additionally, the changes in the death ratio demonstrated a noticeable correlation with the socio-economic condition of each county. Moreover, the results showed a promising classification accuracy score as high as 90%.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/prevención & control , Máscaras/tendencias , California , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Política de Salud , Humanos , Aprendizaje Automático , Máscaras/estadística & datos numéricos , Oregon , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Washingtón
12.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces ; 13(48): 56725-56751, 2021 Dec 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34797624

RESUMEN

Management of the COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has relied in part on the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Face masks, as a representative example of PPE, have made a particularly significant contribution. However, most commonly used face masks are made of materials lacking inactivation properties against either SARS-CoV-2 or multidrug-resistant bacteria. Therefore, symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals wearing masks can still infect others due to viable microbial loads escaping from the masks. Moreover, microbial contact transmission can occur by touching the mask, and the discarded masks are an increasing source of contaminated biological waste and a serious environmental threat. For this reason, during the current pandemic, many researchers have worked to develop face masks made of advanced materials with intrinsic antimicrobial, self-cleaning, reusable, and/or biodegradable properties, thereby providing extra protection against pathogens in a sustainable manner. To overview this segment of the remarkable efforts against COVID-19, this review describes the different types of commercialized face masks, their main fabrication methods and treatments, and the progress achieved in face mask development.


Asunto(s)
Máscaras/tendencias , Antiinfecciosos/química , Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Biodegradación Ambiental , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/virología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Máscaras/clasificación , Reciclaje , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de los fármacos , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación
14.
PLoS One ; 16(10): e0259037, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34710158

RESUMEN

Epidemiological simulations as a method are used to better understand and predict the spreading of infectious diseases, for example of COVID-19. This paper presents an approach that combines a well-established approach from transportation modelling that uses person-centric data-driven human mobility modelling with a mechanistic infection model and a person-centric disease progression model. The model includes the consequences of different room sizes, air exchange rates, disease import, changed activity participation rates over time (coming from mobility data), masks, indoors vs. outdoors leisure activities, and of contact tracing. It is validated against the infection dynamics in Berlin (Germany). The model can be used to understand the contributions of different activity types to the infection dynamics over time. It predicts the effects of contact reductions, school closures/vacations, masks, or the effect of moving leisure activities from outdoors to indoors in fall, and is thus able to quantitatively predict the consequences of interventions. It is shown that these effects are best given as additive changes of the reproduction number R. The model also explains why contact reductions have decreasing marginal returns, i.e. the first 50% of contact reductions have considerably more effect than the second 50%. Our work shows that is is possible to build detailed epidemiological simulations from microscopic mobility models relatively quickly. They can be used to investigate mechanical aspects of the dynamics, such as the transmission from political decisions via human behavior to infections, consequences of different lockdown measures, or consequences of wearing masks in certain situations. The results can be used to inform political decisions.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Trazado de Contacto/métodos , Berlin , COVID-19/metabolismo , Teléfono Celular/tendencias , Simulación por Computador , Alemania , Desinfección de las Manos/tendencias , Humanos , Máscaras/tendencias , Modelos Teóricos , Distanciamiento Físico , Dinámica Poblacional/tendencias , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Análisis de Sistemas
15.
Rural Remote Health ; 21(3): 6596, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34252284

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Face masks are widely recommended as a COVID-19 prevention strategy. State mask mandates have generally reduced the spread of the disease, but decisions to wear a mask depend on many factors. Recent increases in case rates in rural areas following initial outbreaks in more densely populated areas highlight the need to focus on prevention and education. Messaging about disease risk has faced challenges in rural areas in the past. While surges in cases within some communities are likely an impetus for behavior change, rising case rates likely explain only part of mask-wearing decisions. The current study examined the relationship between county-level indicators of rurality and mask wearing in the USA. METHODS: National data from the New York Times' COVID-19 cross-sectional mask survey was used to identify the percentage of a county's residents who reported always/frequently wearing a mask (2-14 July 2020). The New York Times' COVID-19 data repository was used to calculate county-level daily case rates for the 2 weeks preceding the mask survey (15 June - 1 July 2020), and defined county rurality using the Index of Relative Rurality (n=3103 counties). Multivariate linear regression was used to predict mask wearing across levels of rurality. The model was adjusted for daily case rates and other relevant county-level confounders, including county-level indicators of age, race/ethnicity, gender, political partisanship, income inequality, and whether each county was subject to a statewide mask mandate. RESULTS: Large clusters of counties with high rurality and low mask wearing were observed in the Midwest, upper Midwest, and mountainous West. Holding daily case rates and other county characteristics constant, the predicted probability of wearing a mask decreased significantly as counties became more rural (β=-0.560; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Upticks in COVID-19 cases and deaths in rural areas are expected to continue, and localized outbreaks will likely occur indefinitely. The present findings highlight the need to better understand the mechanisms underlying perceptions of COVID-19 risk in rural areas. Dissemination of scientifically correct and consistent information is critical during national emergencies.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Máscaras/tendencias , Población Rural/tendencias , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Socioeconómicos
16.
Neuron ; 109(12): 1918-1920, 2021 06 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34139182

RESUMEN

Worldwide use of face masks as personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic has changed interpersonal interactions in myriad ways, likely permanently. Creative strategies like the PPE Portrait Project serve to mitigate social disconnection resulting from facial feature obstruction.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Expresión Facial , Relaciones Interpersonales , Máscaras/tendencias , COVID-19/prevención & control , Emoción Expresada/fisiología , Predicción , Humanos , Equipo de Protección Personal/tendencias
17.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(21)2021 05 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33958443

RESUMEN

The tempo-spatial patterns of Covid-19 infections are a result of nested personal, societal, and political decisions that involve complicated epidemiological dynamics across overlapping spatial scales. High infection "hotspots" interspersed within regions where infections remained sporadic were ubiquitous early in the outbreak, but the spatial signature of the infection evolved to affect most regions equally, albeit with distinct temporal patterns. The sparseness of Covid-19 infections in the United States was analyzed at scales spanning from 10 to 2,600 km (county to continental scale). Spatial evolution of Covid-19 cases in the United States followed multifractal scaling. A rapid increase in the spatial correlation was identified early in the outbreak (March to April). Then, the increase continued at a slower rate and approached the spatial correlation of human population. Instead of adopting agent-based models that require tracking of individuals, a kernel-modulated approach is developed to characterize the dynamic spreading of disease in a multifractal distributed susceptible population. Multiphase Covid-19 epidemics were reasonably reproduced by the proposed kernel-modulated susceptible-infectious-recovered (SIR) model. The work explained the fact that while the reproduction number was reduced due to nonpharmaceutical interventions (e.g., masks, social distancing, etc.), subsequent multiple epidemic waves still occurred; this was due to an increase in susceptible population flow following a relaxation of travel restrictions and corollary stay-at-home orders. This study provides an original interpretation of Covid-19 spread together with a pragmatic approach that can be imminently used to capture the spatial intermittency at all epidemiologically relevant scales while preserving the "disordered" spatial pattern of infectious cases.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , COVID-19/metabolismo , Humanos , Máscaras/tendencias , Modelos Teóricos , Pandemias , Distanciamiento Físico , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
18.
PLoS One ; 16(4): e0250817, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33909669

RESUMEN

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused an unprecedented public health crisis worldwide. Its intense politicization constantly made headlines, especially regarding the use of face masks as a safety precaution. However, the extent to which public opinion is polarized on wearing masks has remained anecdotal and the verbal representation of this polarization has not been explored. This study examined the types, themes, temporal trends, and exchange patterns of hashtags about mask wearing posted from March 1 to August 1, 2020 by Twitter users based in the United States. On the one hand, we found a stark rhetorical polarization in terms of semantic antagonism between pro- and anti-mask hashtags, exponential frequency increases of both types of hashtags during the period under study, in parallel to growing COVID-19 case counts, state mask mandates, and media coverage. On the other hand, the results showed an asymmetric participatory polarization in terms of a predominance of pro-mask hashtags along with an "echo chamber" effect in the dominant pro-mask group, which ignored the subversive rhetoric of the anti-mask minority. Notwithstanding the limitations of the research, this study provides a nuanced account of the digital polarization of public opinion on mask wearing. It draws attention to political polarization both as a rhetorical phenomenon and as a participatory process.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Máscaras/tendencias , Medios de Comunicación Sociales/tendencias , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Política , Salud Pública , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
A A Pract ; 15(4): e01449, 2021 Apr 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33905378

RESUMEN

Snorkel masks have become an option for personal protective equipment (PPE) due to the shortage of air filtration at least 95% of airborne particle (N95) masks as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We developed a 3D design of a triheaded adapter that connects a snorkel mask to 3 different National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-approved air filtration at least 99% of airborne particles (N99) filters with the aim of improving wearer comfort. We measured the resistance of the new triheaded adapter to be one-third the resistance of the single adapter. Interdepartmental survey of anesthesiologists showed an improvement in perceived comfort when using the triheaded adapter as compared to the single adapter.


Asunto(s)
Anestesiólogos/tendencias , COVID-19/prevención & control , Diseño de Equipo/tendencias , Máscaras/tendencias , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Equipo de Protección Personal/tendencias , Anestesiólogos/normas , COVID-19/epidemiología , Diseño de Equipo/normas , Humanos , Máscaras/normas , Equipo de Protección Personal/normas
20.
PLoS One ; 16(4): e0249677, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33878131

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused severe health and economic impacts globally. Strategies to safely reopen economies, travel and trade are a high priority. Until a reliable vaccine is available, non-pharmaceutical techniques are the only available means of disease control. In this paper, we aim to evaluate the extent to which social distancing (SD) and facemask (FM) use can mitigate the transmission of COVID-19 when restrictions are lifted. We used a microsimulation activity-based model for Sydney Greater Metropolitan Area, to evaluate the power of SD and FM in controlling the pandemic under numerous scenarios. The hypothetical scenarios are designed to picture feasible futures under different assumptions. Assuming that the isolation of infected cases and the quarantining of close contacts are in place, different numerical tests are conducted and a full factorial two-way MANOVA test is used to evaluate the effectiveness of the FM and SD control strategies. The main and interactive effects of the containment strategies are evaluated by the total number of infections, percentage of infections reduction, the time it takes to get the pandemic under control, and the intensity of active cases.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/economía , COVID-19/prevención & control , Máscaras/economía , Máscaras/tendencias , Distanciamiento Físico , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Cuarentena , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Viaje
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...